This means you’re not limited to the box design model principle and have more design freedom to work with. The most exciting pro, in my opinion, is the free positioning design feature.Publishing is a breeze, and the URLs you get are secure. Framer allows for custom domains, although there is a fee if you don’t want their signature “framer.website” at the end of your URL.Although not as robust as what you’d find on Webflow or Bubble, Framer also supports CMS, which is a plus.If you’re already familiar with animating design elements like buttons with smart animate in Figma, you’ll feel right at home with the transitions available in Framer.If you’ve already got your portfolio set up in Figma, you’ll love the feature that lets you instantly copy and paste layers, frames, and autolayouts onto the design board.Framer is super easy to learn, thanks to a plethora of tutorial videos that walk you through every feature of the tool.Let me break down some of the pros of using Framer that I’ve discovered during my own 2-week trial: So if you’re ready to take your website design to the next level, Framer is definitely worth checking out! ![]() Not to mention, Framer offers some stunning explainer videos that’ll help you get started in no time. As a Figma user, you can easily pick up Framer in just a few hours (I myself learned it in just 3 hours!) and have your portfolio website up and running in just 3 days. One thing that sets Framer apart from competitors like Webflow or Bubble is its impressive Free Positioning feature. Cool yeahįramer is the ultimate no-code tool for creating a website that looks like it was designed by a pro. What if I told you I recently came across a tool that allows you instantly build and publish your portfolio to a live website?. But let’s be real, even though these tools claim to be easy-peasy and don’t require coding knowledge, in my experience, some of them still need a basic understanding of HTML or CSS to get your groove on and make your vision come to life. Whether you are an amateur or a professional doesn’t matter.I’m guessing a lot of us have our portfolios all decked out in Figma and are currently trying to figure out how to transform it into a website using no-code tools like Webflow or Bubble. Does the body of work take an innovative or unique approach to the subject matter?. ![]() What technical and presentation choices has the photographer made, and are they appropriate – for the work? For example, is there a clear reason for the work being in black and white versus a digitally enhanced palette?.Are each of the images individually strong?.Is a theme or topic carried throughout the portfolio in a fully resolved, consistent manner?.Is the work new, i.e., created in the past five years?.Their website states that when examining entries, Aperture’s editors and curatorial staff will consider the following criteria: ![]() When it comes time to enter you will also need to submit a CV, a bio, and a statement about your shots. Subscription to their magazine is currently around $75 per year for which you receive 4 issues of the magazine. The Aperture Portfolio Prize is open exclusively to Aperture magazine print subscribers so it’s a little different from other photography competitions on this list. This photography competition is looking for new photographers who deserve recognition in contemporary work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |